If you work in the artificial intelligence field, or really any tech space, you’ve likely encountered a plethora of buzzwords and jargon. While some technical terminology is necessary, an overreliance on corporate speak and empty buzzwords can make your writing confusing, hollow, and downright cringeworthy.
As AI becomes more mainstream, certain words and phrases are being thrown around haphazardly to the point of becoming meaningless. Let’s examine 30 of the most overused, eye-roll-inducing AI buzzwords that should be avoided or used very sparingly in your content writing:
30 Most Overused AI Words
- Elevate
- Delve
- Explore
- Leverage
- Enhance
- Utilize
- Foster
- Propel
- Optimize
- Catalyze
- Disrupt
- Synergize
- Ensure
- Comprehensive
- Illuminate
- Cultivate
- Prowess
- Harness
- Turbocharge
- Spearheaded
- Energize
- Navigate
- Deploy
- Elucidate
- Galvanize
- Reimagine
- Streamline
- Unlock
- Seamless
- Discover
Problem with Buzzwords
While some of these buzzwords have real meanings, they’ve been so overused in marketing copy and business-speak that they’ve become trite and ineffective. Does everything really need to be “disruptive”, “cutting-edge” and “revolutionary”?
Aim for Clear Language
Instead of peppering your AI writing with these clichéd words, focus on using clear, descriptive language. Give concrete examples and avoid over-inflated claims. With AI being such a new and complex field, using straightforward terminology will make your point much more effectively than tired corporate jargon.
Of course, the occasional buzzword can have its place when used purposefully. But make sure you aren’t leaning on them as crutches to make your AI content sound smarter or more authoritative than it is. Direct, human language will give you much more credibility.
So audit your content for these AI overused words buzzwords and be ruthless about cutting them out. Your readers will appreciate writing that is clear, actionable and avoids unnecessarily flowery or inflated language. Leave the jargon behind.
Leave a Reply